Some people believe that the best way to control accidents on city streets is to lower the speed limit, but others think there are better ways to improve the safety on city streets.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The number of serious accidents is growing because more and more people are driving cars on city streets. Some think the solution lies in lowering speed limits, but others think that improving public transportation will have a more powerful effect as it will take cars off the road completely. I believe both solutions are valid. This essay will consider the different viewpoints before deciding what is the best solution.
There are some that see speeding as the main reason why people are involved in motor vehicle accidents and think that driving slower can solve the problem. Indeed, if people drove slower throughout the city, the risk and frequency of accidents would decrease because the faster a car travels, the more damage it can do to whatever it hits. Many cities around the world, like Paris, France, have significantly lowered their speed limits over the last decade and it seems that fewer serious incidents have been reported.
However, some think that streets would be safer with fewer cars on the road and so the solution lies in improving public transportation. Faster and more efficient subway and bus systems along with reliable high-speed train service in and out of a city will make it easier for commuters to choose an alternative to driving. Cities, like Seoul Korea, that have focused on building public transport that is reliable, fast and safe are examples of how this approach can reduce the number of traffic accidents while keeping people moving.
My opinion is a balance of the two. Cities that have been developed with great public transport systems have fewer car problems on the road and if they also have lower speed limits, they are an ideal place to visit or work in. Brussels, Belgium is an example of this as it has fast and reliable tram, bus and metro systems and it also ensures that drivers maintain slower speeds by installing speed bumps, traffic circles and frequent speed monitoring devices so there are far fewer reports of serious accidents.
City streets need to be safer for everyone and speeding is definitely a problem but with improved public transit, there will be fewer cars to worry about. If cities make drivers slow down and also maintain an efficient rail and bus system, the issue of safe roads will be reduced, and we can all feel safe getting around.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
- Many people these days have computer, laptops, telephones at their home for work. Do you think, working from home has more advantages or disadvantages? Give reasons. 84
- Nowadays the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing Why is this happening Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative 81
- You have recently stayed in a hotel and after returning back you realize that you have left a piece of cloth at your hotel room. Write a letter to manager of hotel.In the letter, you should:explain the clothingsay where you left itwhat the manager should 81
- You have recently moved to a different house. Write a letter to a friend. In your letter1) explain why you have moved.2) describe the new house.3) Invite your friend to come and visit. 73
- More people are spending their free time watching movies. Why is this? Is it a good thing or bad thing? 78
Comments
In the salad days of
Essay topics: Some people believe that the best way to control accidents on city streets is to lower the speed limit, but others think there are better ways to improve the safety on city streets.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the salad days of Millennium, some believe that by reducing the speed limit will minimize the accidents on city roads whereas others argue that there are significant ways to enhance safety system on city streets. The following paragraphs would shed light on both approaches and why I believe that the arguments for maintaining low speed are stronger.
There are two main reasons why people believe that control the vehicle speed on roads will have a significant reduction on the scale of the accident. First and foremost, if the person drives slowly, he or she can have full control on roadside pedestrians and act according to the traffic lights, and in the case, if any person or child gets stuck in the middle of the road, a driver can stop the vehicle without colliding with pedestrians. For instance, in all developed nations, a traffic rule is to follow 40 km/hr. on local city roads and stop 50 meters prior to the zebra crossing. Furthermore, lowering the vehicle speed won't cause traffic jam which leads to maintaining certain gap between cars and trucks to avoid major damage to their vehicle bodies and reduce casualties during accidents.
However, others argue that we should have the best ways to manage speeds of cars and two-wheelers on city streets. Firstly, the government should regulate laws regarding traffic system such as collecting huge fine from civilians and youngsters who breach rules and regulations and involved in a street race on city roads. Secondly, encouraging citizens to commute by public transport which significantly reduces the proportion of accidents. For example, light rail can minimize many cars and two-wheeler commuters during peak hours.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have merits. However, I believe it is better to focus on limiting the vehicle speed on city roads would reduce the number of major and minor accidents. At the same time, the government should tackle this issue by implementing any of the aforementioned solutions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93129770992 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37854015509 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2892478142 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.2 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21888852405 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801873606217 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388586603431 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130991125093 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448792024987 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.