The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of moviegoers in a specific European country in different days in a week over a four- year period from 2003 to 2007.
Overall, there are an enormous fluctuation in the number of people watching movie in cinema each day in a week. Another interesting point is that the people rather going to the cinema on the weekend than on Monday to Friday.
Looking at details, in 2003 the percentage of audience in the cinema reached the peak at 40% on Saturday while this figure for Friday and Sunday similarly is 30%. In the other days, the number of people higher at around 17% on Tuesday and lowest in the middle of the week, which just is a quarter of the Saturday’s figure, under 10%.
However, in the next 4 years, the number of moviegoers in cinema has been improved remarkably. The cinemas experienced a dramatic raise on Saturdays in 2005 and 2007, at 45% and 43% respectively. Meanwhile, this figures for the Wednesday fell down steady from above 155 in 2003 to 14% and 5% in turn. Finally, the proportion of people going to cinema stayed unchanged over the period on Friday, at 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Nancysachdeva | view | |
| 2021-03-08 | Sahithi V9 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | hin07 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one twon who rode bicycles in 2011 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 206.0 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.685 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65412414932 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5371705558 44.8134815571 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 16.8248392259 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 4.34317383033 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258668287331 0.216113520407 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988788629391 0.0766984524023 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692858156475 0.0603063233224 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156263456399 0.12726935374 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634159257318 0.0580467560999 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.