Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
In present day, an increase in the number of package tours to distant destinations such as mountainous areas mark a new tendency of the tourist industry. Although this development is beneficial to the local residents in terms of economy and living conditions, it can have deleterious effects on the environment and the social security of these areas.
On the one hand, increasing package holidays to remotes areas is closely associated with the growth of the economy. For one thing, this new trend in tourism can create more employments in the local areas as the job market for tourist-related services frequently need human resources. This in turn provides stable income for local dwellers. What is more, such development in employment rates could be equal to the increase of income tax contributing to the budget of local government. As a result, local authorities can help raise the living standards of people, starting by having important infrastructure established like the installation of water pipes or construction of hospitals.
On the other hand, the development of package tours to remoted areas may act as a detriment to the local environment as well as public security. Firstly, the construction of tourism facilities like hotels can drastically change the landscape of one area, meaning the loss of habitat to local species. Also, massive hordes of tourists scramming to these remoted communities may lead to a serious risk of security as the tourists can have disrespectful behavior to the customs of local people or involve themselves in criminal acts like illegal trafficking.
In sum, despite the advantages the rapid growth in popularity of organized tours to remoted destinations could bring about, it is more likely to exert negative influences on these areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | tuanah | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | tuanah | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | vishal sachdeva | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | ggnsaini08 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | ggnsaini08 | 73 | view |
- Scientist agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Governments spend a lot of money on public celebrations such as national holidays and public festivals. Some people say that the government spends too much on this and that they should use this money on other useful things. 73
- In some countries, the governments encourage industries and business to move out from large cities to regional areas. Do you think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 67
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.To what extend do you agree? 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.To what extend do you agree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, for one thing, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05062244833 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7294775621 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.363636364 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292773790249 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103246792154 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597182184788 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163190956566 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271931337141 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.