the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy, and portugal between 1967 and 2007.
a breakdown of changes in the rates of Carbon dioxide emissions in four different countries from 1967 to 2007 is depicted by the line chart. Overall, there are two figures experienced upward trend while the others dropped significantly over the period of time. Although in the first period, the figures showed a large gap, they had successfully shrunk in the end of period.
Initially, in 1967, England and Sweden stood at around 11 metric tonnes and just over 8 metric tonnes ,respectively. In the next decade, the average of CO2 in UK remained steady, while sweden enjoyed a sharp growth by approximately 3 metric tonnes. Furthermore, a decrease trend was shown in both English and Sweden, with 5 metric tonnes and 9 metric tonnes.
It is clear that portugal witnessed a constan improvement in the first 20 years, with nearly 3 metric tonnes. Similarly, italy also enjoyed an improve trend. this started with a sharp climb to just over 6 metric tonnes and successfully overtaken the figure for CO2 emissions produced by Sweden. In the end of period, a slight movement was illustrated in Portugal's figure, whereas italy remained steady in the second rank, with just under 8 metric tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Thebar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
a breakdown of changes in the rates of Ca...
^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e others dropped significantly over the period of time. Although in the first period, the fig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly over the period of time. Although in the first period, the figures showed a l...
^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ric tonnes and just over 8 metric tonnes ,respectively. In the next decade, the av...
^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etric tonnes and 9 metric tonnes. It is clear that portugal witnessed a constan ...
^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...c tonnes. Similarly, italy also enjoyed an improve trend. this started with a sharp climb ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...y, italy also enjoyed an improve trend. this started with a sharp climb to just over...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73247140882 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0337296841 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140136061528 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563094952189 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528828870901 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930593230735 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171649782448 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.