lifetime employment
Nowadays, it is rare to find a professional individual who spends many years in the same organization. A long-term, lifetime job can be both beneficial and detrimental. On the one hand, it can give you a sense of safety and provide a bunch of opportunities to advance in an organization. On the other hand, it can also stop the growth and prevent the employee from learning new skills or experiencing new trades in the workforce; which is one of the reasons why people are changing jobs more than ever before.
In the first place, sticking with one organization can result in career stagnation. In other words, the employed person gradually becomes comfortable with the job payments, the amount of job strain, and the workplace environment. In fact, career stagnation causes the employed person does not even consider thinking about any other career opportunities. At the same time, the person may become robotic in the same routine which prevents him/her from being a creative employee. For instance, a long-term boss may give you the same daily demands which may seem an easy schedule to follow. However, constantly fulfilling the needs of your employer holds you back from discovering the talents which you never knew you had.
In the second place, having the same job for many years can negatively affect your Curriculum Vitae (CV). As a matter of fact, companies sometimes look for a potential candidate with an array of experiences. In other words, working for the same employer for many years causes your CV to become dull and dry, lacking versatility in skills and services. In fact, a boring CV may get you overlooked by competition that has varied experience in their career history.
To conclude, lifetime employment is not for everyone. Depending on your needs and current situation, it may harm you or benefit you in many ways. Since there are several possible advantages and disadvantages, you need to 'weigh' which are the most important for you.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | Mahbod Abrisham | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... strain, and the workplace environment. In fact, career stagnation causes the empl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99085365854 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83084316713 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.813241061 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2941176471 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141020318364 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601755715158 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120520904802 0.0662205650399 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860042195975 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435189347965 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.