Does the use of computer/technology benefit the educational process?
In today’s modern world technology has become essential. Phones, laptops and many other means are all used in our everyday life. However, People today tend to focus more on its use within the context of education. While for some it may sound as a good idea to use technology within the context of education, for others it is not.
To begin with, the use of technology can smooth the process of learning. Many students today struggle to keep up with their classmates’ pace, but with the help of technology they could easily overcome that. Students now can use the technology to look for reliable resources such videos, articles which could help them understand their course material better. Not only the use of technology makes the process of learning easier, but it also enhances the students-teacher relationship. Sometimes students might not be able to ask questions to their teachers due to their shyness and embarassment, and that could hamper students’ academic performance. However, with the use of technology students might be able to do so since they could easily reach their teachers.
Although the use of technology may offer students some great benefits, it is still not right for them. One of the main challenges of technology is that it requires a great self-control since it is too addictive. Students in such an age are still not mature enough to handle its use. Therefore, allowing them to use it will only lead to some unbearable results. Another side or ill effect of technology on students is that it kills their creativity. Instead of depending on themselves, Students now use the means of technology like internet to just copy and past the information so they can get a good grade. In other words, the use of technology doesn’t only kill students’ creativity, but it also lead to incompetency.
As a conclusion, There are always two side of the coin and technology is not excluded. While some may support technology, others may not. Sometimes the use of technology may help students to improve their abilities of learning and even enhance the relationship between students and their teachers. However, technology may not help sometimes. Instead of helping students, technology may have the opposite results since it can be both addictive and hard to handle; adding to it that it kills creativity too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | Adam.Mortada | 56 | view |
- Does the use of computer technology benefit the educational process 42
- Is homeschooling compatible with better than traditional schooling 93
- Free educaiton 11
- Can online education be compatible with a traditional one 68
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ill effect of technology on students is that it kills their creativity. Instead ...
^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
... students' creativity, but it also lead to incompetency. As a conclusion, Ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 1.00243902439 1796% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 5.60731707317 624% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 965.302439024 203% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 388.0 196.424390244 198% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0618556701 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94946273554 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 106.607317073 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 283.868780488 218% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7379229217 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217869638615 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857559830665 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054092520369 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147072873462 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260251909853 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.