The given line graph illustrates the changes taken place in the share price of Outokumpu campanies from 2006 to 2010. A cursory glance at the graph is enough to make it clear that the share price of Outokumpu campanies was noticed same in the 2006 and in the end of 2010 with fluctuations in between the given time period.
To commence with, the share price of Outokump campanies initially stood at 13 euros in january, 2006 and after that it started to rise and peaked at 30 euros by the starting of the year 2007. It is followed by gradual decline in the share price of Outokumpo campanies and reached at 22 euros with some minor flutuations till the end of the year 2007.
Further scrutinising the chart, it is clear that in the beginning of the year 2008, the share prices again soared and regains its zenith position at 30 euros. After that a drastic fall was noticed in the share prices and it touched its all time low price at 7 euros by the end of the 2008. From 2009 to end of the 2010 there was a gradual increase in the share price of Ourokumpo campanies witnessed with few fluctuations and it remained similar as in the 2006 at 13 euros.
Overall, it is lucid that the share price of Outokumpo campanies was almost simlar initially and at the end of the given time period.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
- the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002. 67
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'january 2006'.
Suggestion: january 2006
...ampanies initially stood at 13 euros in january, 2006 and after that it started to rise and p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ions till the end of the year 2007. Further scrutinising the chart, it is clear tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43697478992 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35899581149 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415966386555 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.3843070362 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199106727311 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117081330116 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706879475482 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138273578471 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778888825773 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.