In recent years, many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people
Nowadays,comparing the local people, mostly tourists have a tendency in order to visit museums. There are several reasons such as admission fee or common artifacts for culture and some implemented policies are able to attract local citizens.
To begin with, as a consequence of several reasons local citizens are not enthusiastic about museums and historical sites, which are accommodated in their country. First of all, some amount of money, which is utilized for maintenance of museums and historical sites, required in order to participate to exhibitions or enter to these places. Thus, considering that some of individuals do not manage a fortunate income and tones of entertainment activities attract their attention, they prefer other kinds of exhilarating activities. For example, people tend to attend to musical concerts instead of exhibitions. Secondly, artifacts, which are represented in museums or historical buildings, are rife for local people and they do not find them interesting. Therefore, different from local citizens, tourists meet the new culture and taken into account that such kind of places are the best option in order to learn culture of the country, they are curious about these places.
Local compatriots are able to attracted by implemented tricks and policies. One way is that, museums and historical sites should not be monetary for local people. In that case, visiting these places become exhilarating activity and habit for them, while other kinds of activities also available. Furthermore, museums should present wide range of various artifacts in exhibitions in order to draw attention of not only tourist but also local citizens. In terms of it, new things, which is stem from other museums as a trivial, attract people.
In conclusion, while historical sites and museums are not favorable for majority of local people in opposite of tourists, administration staff of these places can implement some policies in order to change this situation.
- Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some some or all costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Employers should give its staff at least four weeks of holidays a year to make employees do better in their job. To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 61
- Nowadays most of people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more, do you agree or disagree 78
- Eating sweet foods produces acid is in mouth, which can cause tooth decay(high acid levels are measured by low PH values) 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , comparing
Nowadays,comparing the local people, mostly tourists have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays,comparing the local people, mostly tourists have a tendency in order...
^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the individuals') or simply say ''some individuals''.
Suggestion: some of the individuals; some individuals
...to these places. Thus, considering that some of individuals do not manage a fortunate income and to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4064516129 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96188060741 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3155550226 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305046816889 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116002660309 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689438468702 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203934410964 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471888043055 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.