The pie graphs illustrate how the proportion in typical meals of three types of nutrients varies from each other in the USA, all of them are unhealthy if eaten too much.
Overall, It is clear that the use of added sugar is diverse from the sodium and the Saturated fat.
Looking at the detail, dinner occupies the biggest proportion(about 40%) of sodium and saturated fat. On the contrary, only 23% of added sugar are used in dinner, and what top the percentage added sugar is snacks which use 42% of added sugar. In addition, added sugar, made up breakfast, is less than in lunch at 16% which is similar with the proportion of breakfast in sodium(14%) and in saturated fat(16%). The rest of 19% of added sugar is used in lunch. Furthermore, 29% of sodium and 26% of saturated fat belong to lunch. Finally, snacks occupy 14% of the percentage of sodium and 21% of the proportion of saturated fat.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, look, so, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58125 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56112005527 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3095444653 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0842574315355 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375556430373 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692154370252 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821690267909 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962864252005 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.