Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both and give your opinion.
There is an issue about the detrimental effect people cause on the ecosystem. Some ecologists believe that this influence is permanent, while others disagree and argue that people still can improve the situation. This essay agrees with the idea of improvement.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists say that it is too late to safe the other species. To begin with, the population of the world is growing. According to sociologists, in five years the number of people will reach eight billion people, which means extra two billion in such a short period. To satisfy their needs, governments will have to develop more natural habitant and displace other species. Another reason is that many areas are heavily contaminated. Humans have polluted many lands so strongly that they cannot sustain any forms of life for hundreds of years, such as dumps of household and nuclear waste. Furthermore, most of the flora and fauna is on the verge of extinction. Agriculture and poaching have made such many species endangered, that it is hardly possible to revive them to the former sizes.
However, other ecologists claim that all harmful effect of humans on the environment is reversible. They justify their point of view with the following arguments. Firstly, the usage of alternative sources of energy should be dominant. To generate both electricity and heat, people ought to exploit sun energy and wind power rather than burn fossil fuels, thereby stopping the pollution of the natural areas with deadly gases. Secondly, the purification of ecosystem is necessary. Many areas of land and water need cleaning from garbage, toxic waste and oil spills, so that animals and plants can thrive there. Finally, governments should protect natural habitats. To fight poaching and illegal disposal, countries should impose laws and organize groups, which are intended to punish those, who damage the environment as well as its living creatures.
In conclusion, although some ecologists are pessimistic about changing human attitude towards animals and plants, I think that people should take actions and save them for future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Karthikielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Gunjan Pratap | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | mdsameer | 56 | view |
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time say what action 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 84
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant. You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant.In the letter: explain why you were at the restaurant (what event)describe the problems ( 84
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products. What problems does it cause? What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62503150703 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630498533724 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8646790442 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179512192909 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427339412743 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499103686214 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118952521689 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507573215855 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.