In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them.
Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Paying for senior members of the family to stay in a caring home has always been a controversial topic. It is noticeable the increasing debate over caring home service to be provided free by the Government or the family should be charge with the admission fee. I believe this should be jointly funded by the Government and family.
There are both private and public caring homes. Government subsidises both to provide the best health care facilities to elders and assurance to the family and a cheaper option. Government funding is essential in supporting the operation of caring homes. Taxation is deemed as working-class contributions back to the community, this is part of funding for civil servants’ income, health care and education funding. Elders having worked most of their life and contributed to this. They are entitled to their benefits at later stage of their life. Further, the funding would also help with the training of staff and ensure basis operation cost is covered.
My view that family should also be responsible as it helps them to remember they have family members at a caring home and avoiding neglection. From my experience, my grandparents both have been admitted to private caring home as private nurse cost significantly, together we were unable to provide care for 24 hours. Private caring home provides a comfortable and quiet environment for my grandparents to stay in, and with government subsidies, my family was able to pay less in comparison to hiring a private nurse. In return, we could provide better medication for my grandparents and have them around for a longer duration, together we visit them more often.
In summary, with economic growth, working class would always find difficulty in looking after elderly family requiring continuous care due to illness, as many would be required to find a job to sustain the family basis living requirement. Family to pay for elderly homes and with Government funding would provide the best outcomes for our older generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | tasmia.2601 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | jaspreet aur | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | jellyb0711 | 73 | view |
- Modern medical science has made it possible to combat many diseases. This is one reason that people are living longer lives now than they did in the past. Discuss the effects this might have on society. 89
- Some people believe that subjects such as art, music, drama and creative writing have a bright future. Therefore, schools should spend more time teaching these subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 78
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Why? 84
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them.Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? Gi 73
- Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'charged'?
Suggestion: charged
... the Government or the family should be charge with the admission fee. I believe this ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1303030303 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81255384603 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1463909945 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334219862747 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118852163748 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571468287149 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215063387675 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367189238149 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.