The picture displays the design for a wave-energy machine as well as it's location. The designs shows that the machine has two chambers or compartments, one above and one beneath.
In overview, the chamber beneath is immersed in water while the one above stays out of water, there is a valve towards the extreme right of the upper chamber through which water flows out of the machine, meanwhile; it has two turbines which will drive the machine. Air flows from the upper chamber into the machine and spins the turbine some more. Meanwhile, the entire machine is powered by an electric generator outside it towards the upper part of the left hand side of the machine.
As regards the location options of this wave energy machine, there are two major options provided in the picture, one is a high installation cost while the other is a low installation cost. Concerning the high installation cost option, it is stated that this will have large waves and large output. While the low installation cost option is its exact opposite in that it will produce small waves and consequently low output.
Conclusively, both location options for the wave energy machine has its pros and cons, i.e the more the installation cost, the more the output of the machine.
- In some countries, many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...ne as well as its location. The designs shows that the machine has two chambers or co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, well, while, as regards, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86511627907 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54921911924 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8445815093 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151777645422 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885778407981 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987908534667 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129903874122 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102683471583 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.