The use of violence in music lyrics, video games, and films seen by children is causing concern in many societies. What problems may be caused by this type of violent imagery, and what steps could be taken to lessen the impact on young people?
Some musicians, movie makers, and computer game writers might apply a hazard content within their product, that could definitely harm those who consume it, especially a growing up people. There are different factors appearing here, therefore variable solutions could be suggested.
In the beginning, it seems correct to realize a pool of issues rising behind including a theme of violence into audio, video or games. Firstly, cruelty defines a role model which could be taken as a lead option for youngsters. For example, a hard rock often provides self-destroying music announcing a positive impact of alcohol, drugs or inhumanity. It results in a copy-paste behavior from a younger generation and becomes dangerous for society. Secondly, a youth’s psyche is being influenced by aggressive pictures of lives, that obviously may destroy a relationship between friends or relatives. For instance, some blockbusters are able to generate a willingness to evaluate how a spectator looks like a gunman from a film. Lastly, such violence could initiate dramatic changes in the character of children, and causes a negative social impact. It could mean that every shooter (who plays video shooters) could suppose to do the same things as his or her favorite hero from virtual reality.
Trying, to figure out the possible solutions which can fix the problems risen above, the following variants could be proposed. One of those, a penalization for producers of such images could be applied. They should get a clear understanding of possible consequences of what they do, in terms of influencing on children. Another tool to prevent an asocial attitude to the environment from those who consume cruel media product could be a hard ages limitation. Probably, nobody under 21 years old would be allowed to meet negative pictures. One more appropriate decision could be a step-by-step work with children starting from very young to teenagers, targeted to create a positive picture of the world, to fulfill a child's soul entirely, and to show an opportunity to be outside of all damaging content.
In conclusion, the problem risen in the topic could not be solved quickly. As well as a list of proposed solutions is not only three points, but rather it needs to engage all possible resources to investigate a problem and to suggest the correct curing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Mostafaasadi | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Mostafaasadi | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | anna5224 | 89 | view |
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 78
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
- The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons for children? 56
- some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government However others argue that they should be funded by non government sources e g Business scholarships etc 68
- In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially be younger people, is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we shohuld try to prevent? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ages'' or 'age's'?
Suggestion: ages'; age's
...ume cruel media product could be a hard ages limitation. Probably, nobody under 21 y...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18205804749 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89960770001 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64907651715 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7423339054 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25643768438 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711276468278 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433648965564 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128484753466 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570016123762 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.