In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend?
In modern life, people become independent as well as an enhanced personal lifestyle. However, some prefer to live in a big family with many generations. I would argue that a later option leads to undesirable issues.
To begin with, the generation gap is a fence separating family members, quite a large family leads to many conflicts. Nowadays, youngsters have more audacity compared to the past. As a result, they break taboos and traditional customs which maybe elderly have rejected it. Older people always want their children to obey; nonetheless, younger ones do not like their elders intervening too much in their lives. If a multi-child family according to a somehow drawback, children must share their benefits with siblings, and as a result cut a qualified life.
Secondly, the shrinking family or alone life can be considered as evidence to prove a lower risk lifestyle. A small family with fewer generations living in the same household can avoid conflicts and gap generations. Therefore, the relationship between family members become much close-knit. In addition, parents having fewer children will take care of their kids thoughtfully, this helps these families having a life comfortable and facilities than the multi-child families.
In conclusion, humans always seek a life which is least pressure results from work and relationships from outside making them feel suffocating. A family is a peaceful landing in which any member also can get sympathy and sharing. Thus, the modern trend direct to a small family and single is a good way to entitle people to interest themselves and lovers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 73 | view |
- In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend? 67
- In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend? 73
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Tobacco is a kind of drug. People have been free to use it. Some people think that it should be illegal to use it comparing with other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What is your opinion? 56
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter option leads to undesirable issues. To begin with, the generation gap is a f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somehow') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drawback') instead of another adjective.
...s. If a multi-child family according to a somehow drawback, children must share their benefits wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the least'.
Suggestion: is the least
...lusion, humans always seek a life which is least pressure results from work and relation...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27131782946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87511218144 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4019379299 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217054668705 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698750377407 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562330032008 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128978987908 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341437218152 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.