A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal receive little to no professional dental care, while people in suburban areas in the United States see a dentist an average of 1.25 times per year. Thus, regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay.
The study claims that the children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact they have little or no access to professional dental care, while United states have a significantly better access. The study concludes by saying regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay. This conclusion is baseless in this case and it has little or no data for its support. The first missing fact that needs to be addressed is about the daily hygiene of the children from both these areas. If significant amount of the tested children in the United states does not take proper dental care which in-turn results in their tooth decay, then the dental care cannot be blamed.
Only if enough data about the daily hygiene about children in both the regions are addressed, can we support or oppose the the conclusion. Another missing information is about the food habits about the children in these two distinct areas. Certain sugary foods or fast foods tend to increase the chances for tooth decay significantly. Moreover in a developed country like the United states, the inclination of children towards fast food needs to be taken into consideration. If this proves to be a factor for increased tooth decay in the United States, then the conclusion given after the study can be rendered baseless.
The study gives no information of the food habits of the children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal and it does not give data about the methods they use maintain their teeth healthy. If there is a significantly better method used by them when compared to that of the children in United States, the role of the dental care can be inconsequential when preventing tooth decay. But this conclusion needs more data about the methods they use and their lifestyles. Only if these useful methods could be followed as such in a different country, can we neglect the role of regular dental care in preventing tooth decay. There is also no data about the procedure involved when a child visits a dental care and if enough is done to prevent tooth decay or to counter the effects of bacteria build up. The quality of dental cares in the United States needs to be addressed here.
Rounding up, a lot more data and clarity is required to get a better insight into the situation. More information is needed in the areas of lifestyles, food habits, quality of dental care and the methods used by the children of Nepal to take care of their teeth. Only if sufficient information about the above mentioned areas are given, can we reach a logical conclusion on whether the regular dental care is helpful or not in preventing tooth decay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | AaronFernandes | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | writingishard | 59 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Nalu00 | 53 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | Adz12345 | 53 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 80
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 83
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 474 350
No. of Characters: 2236 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.666 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.717 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.459 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.947 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.417 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.515 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.115 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...are addressed, can we support or oppose the the conclusion. Another missing information...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...are addressed, can we support or oppose the the conclusion. Another missing information...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... chances for tooth decay significantly. Moreover in a developed country like the United ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 474.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80801687764 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5185464562 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396624472574 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7209609103 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.947368421 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290985034915 0.218282227539 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948526986552 0.0743258471296 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129851065378 0.0701772020484 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195257534907 0.128457276422 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115393158574 0.0628817314937 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.