The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The given line graph illustrate the information regarding average proportion of waste material by three different companies between the time period of 2000 and 2015.
Over the span of 15 years, the average amount of waste produce by Company A and B had decreased continuously over the period of time whereas Company C had followed an upward trend.
It is clearly seen that, Company A produce the highest waste material throughout the period, starting from 12 tons of waste material in 2000 and this trend was then decreased gradually over the period of time as stabilized at just under the 9 tons at the end of period. Similarly, waste items produced by Company started from just below the 9 tons in 2000 and there was a gradual increase on these trend up to 11 tons by 2005. After reaching a high of 11 tons in the following year, average proportion of waste materials plummet to 3 tons of waste material over the period of time in the question.
Company C on the other hand showed an upward trend in terms of producing unnecessary materials, starting from just above 3 tons in 2000, this company was than overtaking that of Company B in 2010 and that of Company C in 2012 and reached up to a peak at the end of 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. 73
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne The maps show the town s development over a period of time 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d B had decreased continuously over the period of time whereas Company C had followed an upwar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d was then decreased gradually over the period of time as stabilized at just under the 9 tons ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...et to 3 tons of waste material over the period of time in the question. Company C on the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53846153846 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53772341484 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475113122172 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4859658962 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.166666667 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8333333333 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394137731893 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206288212912 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865427996749 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244344748626 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866427285819 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.