online relationship
In modern time, many individuals spend more time with online relationships rather than those who live in their areas. This issue has become a matter for discussion. In my opinion, while this tendency has some benefits, I would argue that there are far more drawbacks.
From an overall perspective, the online relationship seems to be beneficial simply because this phenomenon could help people easier to make friend in many areas. To illustrate, the social network would allow people to make new friends with many flexible features such as call video or chatting. Thus, people who lack of relationship of the community could feel less lonely when they can connect with people from around the world.
In spite of an argument above, I believe that this trend is also negative for the following reasons. The first disadvantage is that spending more time in online would affect negatively on the connection between family members. To evidence, teenagers would have less interactions with their family members. Therefore, it would create a generation gap between different generations which become popular in contemporary society. Equally important is that these habits would impair their social life in the long term. Young people would be difficult to socialize with people in their communities because of losing communication skills as well as social contacts. Consequence, people would fall into social isolations, and this would cause them metal diseases and other serious issues.
In conclusion, although I recognize the possible positive effects of this tendency, It seems to me that it is a negative development overall.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gue that there are far more drawbacks. From an overall perspective, the online ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct with people from around the world. In spite of an argument above, I believe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun interactions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...bers. To evidence, teenagers would have less interactions with their family members....
^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...become popular in contemporary society. Equally important is that these habits would im...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al diseases and other serious issues. In conclusion, although I recognize the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33852140078 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75787937572 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9659370676 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140729200187 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478389742354 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830943918331 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896904930139 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748452015038 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.