The tabular chart compares the data about the number of native speakers of distinct languages as well as another speakers who are considering these languages as an additional. Overall, it is palpable that Mandarin Chinese has maximum native speakers, while the largest non- native speakers are relating to the English language than that of the rest. Generally, the native speakers of Mandarin Chinese are considering more that are 900 million. Following by, those native speakers who are relating to Hindi, Spanish and English languages who are reaching upto approximately 370 million, whereas Arabic language's native speakers are 206 million which are 3 million more than the native speakers of Portuguese. Analysing further, the maximum non- native speakers of English language which are 603 million, but Portuguese language has least non- native speakers who are 10 million. Apart from this, the non- native speakers of Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, Arabic are 190,120,70 and 24 millions respectively.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 53
- The diagram below shows nitrogen sources and concentration levels in the groundwater of a coastal city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feauters Write at least 150 words 71
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- are computers an essential feature of modern education? What subjects can be better taught using computers? Are there aspects of an education that cannot be taught using computers? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... who are considering these languages as an additional. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ering these languages as an additional. Overall, it is palpable that Mandarin Ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...English language than that of the rest. Generally, the native speakers of Mandar...
^^^
Line 1, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than the native speakers of Portuguese. Analysing further, the maximum non- nati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 957, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...language has least non- native speakers who are 10 million. Apart from this, the non- n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well, whereas, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50967741935 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65516597364 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9050950186 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113531796201 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738755736441 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312222574822 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113531796201 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.