The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart depicts the proportion of power utilised in the USA in the period of 50 years starting from 1980s to 2030 in six main categories: petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind, hydropower.
At the first glance, it is obvious that there is a significant disparity between to top and the bottom position of the statics. Apparently, the use of petrol and oil takes over the graph whereas hydropower has always stood at the lowest rank of the list.
In more details, it is clear from the diagram that the top three most popular consumed energy display a fluctuation throughout the period.They all show the same trend of slipping, recovering slightly and hitting the peak at the end of a time frame. In terms of petrol and oil, it surely took over the chart in these 50 years with around 35 quadrillion units in the early stage and thrive at about 47 quadrillion units at the end, followed by coal and natural gas.
The opposite can be observed when it comes to the 3 smallest domains. further more, only a tiny change can be seen. Probing further, the ratios of these groups: atomic energy, Solar/wind, hydropower only account for 6, 5 and 4 quadrillion units at the last stage of the graph.
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last 10 years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 67
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problems they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel 69
- three major problems in London during 3 years. 56
- Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 78
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...lay a fluctuation throughout the period.They all show the same trend of slipping, re...
^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...hen it comes to the 3 smallest domains. further more, only a tiny change can be seen. P...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67906976744 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56857912123 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613953488372 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3933184745 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.063349063181 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023582979557 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242068949363 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384476453025 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252357548939 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.