Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
We have all witnessed ourselves or people nearby get into political debates and trying to prove their point of view. One such issue at hand is whether the goal of politics should be finding an ideal solution or a middle ground based on the majority consensus. Given that ideal solutions to a various of political problems lead to extremist solutions and upset a lot of people, coming to a reasonable common ground based is the best solution.
Ideal solutions, for most of the times, fall on the extreme ends of the range of solutions. For example, Communism is based on the principle that evry person would be working hard on their own will and strive for the development of a nation. On the other end of the spectrum is Capitalism which is governed by the ideal thinking that everything should be privately owned where people would compete against each other. This sense of a merit-based society would bring a rapid growth in a country's economy.
Although ideal solutions have their own merits, they bring their fair share of disadvantages. They don't appeal to the majority of massses. For example, going back to the idea of Communism, it heavily depends on the assumption that most of the people work on their own will. Russia, which once embraced Communism, failed miserably because people didn't have the incentive to put in extra effort. This led to a decrease in productivity and the nation suffered heavily. Now you might say that Capitalism is the answer to this problem because it rewards people of their work. However, there are problems associated with Capitalism like security threat because of privatization of sensitive government nuclear or military data. This approach has also been critized of making the rich richer and the poor poorer, bringing more social difference.
Since the ultimate goal of politics is to improve more lives of people in a nation, ideal solutions fail to succeed. Reaching a common ground will help balance all the negative aspects of an ideal solution, while giving the same benefits to more number of people in a country. For instance, Germany approaches with a balanced outlook. They have all the essential institutions like military, hospitals, even schools and universities owned by the government, while industries owned by private organizations. Such an approach has made Germany one of the advanced and economically stable nation in the world.
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- “In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Peter Jones plans to build a multi-million-dollar subway system. The subway will run through the major downtown areas, a part of the town where buses serve as the only for 29
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 50
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infa 23
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...their fair share of disadvantages. They dont appeal to the majority of massses. For ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...munism, failed miserably because people didnt have the incentive to put in extra effo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05037783375 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70452498468 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549118387909 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9953944577 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265121348001 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681518690154 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740151002569 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15743834648 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560740771507 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.