The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 and 2007
The line graph provides information about the total number of male and female graduates in the University in Canada between 1992 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that there was a higher number of female graduates than the group of male graduates from the beginning until the end of the period.
To start with, in 1992, the total number of female graduates were nearly 100,000 while male graduates were only over 70,000. Both genders had a steady increase of graduates until 1995, with an addition of around 5,000 graduates for each group. In contrast, after 3 years, a slight decrease was noted wherein its total number of graduates were similar to the total number of male and female graduates last 1992.
In 2000, the male graduates were only three-fourths of the female graduates. After 4 years, male graduates rose to more than 80,000, whereas female graduates increase to about 130,000. At the end of the period, female graduates reached their highest total to almost 150,000 and apparently, the group of male graduates were only around 95,000 in total, with almost 50,000 difference from the opposite gender.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005 56
- the pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- The flow chart below explains how laundry is handled Using information from the flow chart describe the laundry process 80
- Smokers percentage of population 1950 1990 87
- The obesity rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many developed countries Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggestions 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, whereas, while, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02688172043 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40839212794 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9830376497 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266537060575 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151341792633 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107335167211 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220674483754 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113889029671 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.