The chart below gives the information about USA marriages and divorce rate between 1970 to 2000 and marital status of young adults in two of the years. summaries the main information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.
The graph below depicts the data about United states wedding and separation rate in four decades from 1970 and 2000 in millions, while other graph depict the information about marriage status of young people in percentage of adults in 1970 and 2000.
In first graph about two variable marriage and divorce ratio between USA citizens in 1970-2000. The marriage ratio in first two decades in 1970 and 1980 remained constant 2.5 million apart from that, its highest as comparison with others. However, in following two decades wedding ratio decrease successfully from 2.5 to 2 million in 2000. On the other hand divorce ratio observed highest during 1980 about 1.45 million while, in rest of years remained almost constant about 1 million.
In the second graph of marital status of young adults in four variables married, never married, widowed and divorce in 1970 and 2000. In 2000 the percentage of never married and divorced increase with comparison 1970 about five percent enhanced. Although; percentage marriages decrease ten percent and widowed by 2 percent with respect to 1970.
The overall trend in both the graph marriage ratio decrease but divorce percentage increased in preceding years. In each graph four variable compared across two constants.
- The chart below show the export of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in every category of export in 2016 compared with 2015. Summaries the main information by reporting main featur 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries electricity production and consumption during 2014. Summaries the information by reporting main features and made comparison where possible 78
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- some people opinion that its better way to accept the bad situation like unsatisfactory in jobs and lack of money, while other believe that better to try and improve the situation. Discuss both the views an d give your own opinion. 78
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies or interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vie 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ratio' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ratios'.
Suggestion: ratios
...about two variable marriage and divorce ratio between USA citizens in 1970-2000. The ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, while, apart from, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23267326733 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42988633746 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490099009901 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1996887957 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281765914606 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121130130774 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784675675912 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171512529973 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610136939553 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.