The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average. Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates how many cars were owned per 1000 of the population in five European countries in three different years. The figures for the European average are also given.
Overall, it is clear that the figures for car ownership in Greece were lower than those in the other countries. In contrast, car ownership in Germany was higher than the European average.
There was an increase in the number of cars owned in Greece from 300 per 1000 of the population in 2005 to 400 in 2009, before decreasing to 300 again in 2015. Car ownership in Italy saw a similar trend, reaching a peak of 580 in 2009. However, in the UK the number of cars fell over the period from 680 per 1000 people in 2005 to 580 in 2015.
While the number of cars owned per 1000 people remained constant in France, at 700, in Germany the figures were much higher than the European average. In 2005, the figure was 900, and this fell slightly before rising to 980 in 2015. The average in Europe increased over the period, from 700 in 2005 to 790 ten years later.
- In recent years, more and more people tend to live individualy. What are the causes of this trend? Does this have a positive or negative effect on society? 84
- Science finds that by studying the behavior of three-year-old children they can predict if they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent is criminality related to human nature? Is it possible to stop children from being a criminal when they grow up? 61
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48167539267 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22137656793 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8641141673 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30249598024 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120724647286 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707163072165 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180970960073 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611084856194 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.