Paper book are and will always superior than e-book
Digital books have become increasingly common in recent years which has challenged the position of traditional paper-based books. E-books may have many advantages but do not compare favourably to real books in important aspects. This essay will argue that despite the benefits of e-books traditional books are preferable.
Digital books are highly portable and environmentally friendly. One can carry literally hundreds of books around and the only weight will be of the reader device itself giving e-books a huge practical advantage. Also, digital books are simply downloaded off the internet and cause little to no wastage and do not contribute to deforestation. In short, e-books are more convenient and sustainable that paper-based books.
On the other hand, there is research that suggests reading a real book offers a multitude of benefits that e-reading does not. Readers of real books remember much better what they’ve read and reading a real book appears to reduce stress. Moreover, there are suspicions that e-books may be a source of dangerous radiation. Traditional books are both more effective and healthier.
This essay discussed the advantages and disadvantages of e-books and paper-based books. Despite the environmental and practical benefits of e-books, in my opinion traditional books should be preferred as they are more effective and do not carry the psychological and physical risks of e-books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | Reet Bhullar | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Reet Bhullar | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | ghimirra | 82 | view |
- Parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done. What is your opinion? Support it with examples. 55
- Electric car is a solution to both transport and environment issues 80
- Should schools stop teaching handwriting entirely and focus instead on their typing skills? Is handwriting no longer relevant? 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, so, in short, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52054794521 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00128896505 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5270211793 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399823183344 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175757152111 0.0925447433944 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628836761809 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271533974834 0.151781067708 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772315807579 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.