The graphs below show the enrollments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
The graphs compare the numbers of new and total foreign students over national students in Australian universities from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, the Australian universities have enough number of local students and are dominant throughout the period than other foreigners.
From the first graph of overseas students, in 2001 there were 20,000 people who enrolled the universities and about 12,000 of them were newbies. The total student's count was gradually raising till 2009 where there was a sudden increase in new students number and they are about 40,000 also their total was almost double of it. By the end, just a thousand students were fresher in universities and the sum of them were about 81,000.
Secondly, for Aussie students, About 18,000 students are commencing, but the total students was comparatively double than local. There was a slight upsurge for new students next year but till 2007 it was slightly decreasing the new scholar's number. In reverse, the total student's number is growing and had 600,000 local students and merely 20,000 new students in 2007. For the next 3 years, the total students are idle but fresher are slightly declining. It provokes that fresher from abroad are double than the local students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | PRM12 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | subashtimalsina112 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 78 | view |
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people become famous at a young age. Is it a good thing or a bad thing? 56
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17910447761 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5246391086 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1581892442 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330665078965 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152650392144 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839204478787 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240182588342 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058658368897 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.