The pie charts compare the proportions of Italian and Yemeni citizens in three age groups in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Overall Yemen had the younger population in the year 2000, and the same is seen coming for the year 2050. The populations of both countries are guessed to get older over the 50 year period.
In 2000 just over half the Yemeni population were under 14, compared to just over 14% of Italians in the same age group. Only a very small percentage of people in Yemen were over 60 at 3.6%, in contrast to nearly a quarter of the Italian population. The largest group for Italy was the 15-59 year olds with just over 60% while Yemen had 46.3% of its population in this category.
Yemen’s average age is increase with the proportion of over 60 year olds increasing by just over 2% and the middle group rising by 11%, the youngest group with a decrease of nearly 13%. It is predicted that by 2050 the number of people in Italy over 60 will jump to 42.3%, the percentage of those in the youngest bracket will drop to 11.5% and the share in the middle category will decrease to 46.2%.
- how the elderly in the US spent their free time from 1980 to 2010 61
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4801980198 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35656564247 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509900990099 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8072833573 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152999358368 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825508733699 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596174876659 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118745963925 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538093209203 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.