The table below shows the average band scores for students from 4 different countries taking the IELTS Test in 2009.
The table represents the average ielts band scores which students from Germany, France, Vietnam and Malaysia received in the test they took in 2009
Overall, Speaking was the best skill of students in four countries in the ielts test in 2009. It is clear that while German students scored the highest point in listening, writing and speaking skill, Students from Malaysia achieved the highest band scores in reading skill.
It can be seen from the table that while German students scored 6.7 overall, Malaysia students only got 6.4. Also, students from both German and Malaysia had the highest speaking skill scores of 6.9 and 6.8 respectively. Reading was the weakest skill of German students with only 6.3. By contrast, Malaysian students had the lowest score in writing
Turning to the two other countries: Vietnam and France. French students got overall score of 6.5 while overall score of 6.3 was belonged to Vietnamese students. Reading and listening were the skills that French and Vietnamese students had the same score. In writing skills, Students from France were much better than Vietnamese students (6.5 in comparison with 6.2)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | Giang Tran | 72 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 56
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the test they took in 2009 Overall, Speaking was the best skill of students ...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students had the lowest score in writing Turning to the two other countries: Viet...
^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mese students 6.5 in comparison with 6.2
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17837837838 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35225207973 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491891891892 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.784571051 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326968579 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174000872021 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114443291751 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246178308182 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890139914186 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.