Chart summarizing.
The three charts illustrate the situation of the year 2010 about education in five age ranges, 16-24, 24-35, 35-50, 50-75 and 75+, both male and female, in Glasgow, a city of Scotland. It is obvious that most of the population aged between 16-50 attained a university degree. That is to say, Glasgow has a generally sound education level across the city.
To be more specific, four age ranges share the feature that the people with university degree take up the most part, with the only exception aged 75+. Older people tend to have on qualifications compared with younger citizens. Interestingly, the percentage of degree holders are at least 2.5 times as that of school certificate. In other words, those who finish their high school are more likely to acquire further education.
Beside, there is no much differences between different genders of all ages. Due to the aging population and the large portion of citizens with no certificates or degrees, non-qualification holders take up the biggest part of the whole population. However, the gap is not impossible to fill, with less than 10 percent between any education levels.
In conclusion, Glasgow set a marvelous example for the rest of cities in Scotland in terms of educational development and gender equality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | nguyentragiang | view | |
| 2021-01-15 | tamir052222 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | V | 11 | view |
| 2018-09-14 | RockyGagKy | 36 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 73
- Chart summarizing. 11
- Is local history more important than world history when it comes to what our schoolchildren should learn in class? 67
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... further education. Beside, there is no much differences between different gend...
^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rther education. Beside, there is no much differences between different genders o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, at least, in conclusion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11961722488 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86221999325 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66985645933 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5858246534 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2727272727 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0252672808935 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00647823419705 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204859752787 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0129402896528 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224132391432 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.