The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012
The given line graph illustrates the amount of electricity produced from three main sources in France over a period of 32 years starting from 1980.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evident that electricity production from nuclear power registered the highest among the four while the amount of electricity generated from that of renewable energy was by far the lowest during the period shown.
In 1980, about 120 terawatt hours of electricity were produced from thermal power. In the same year, nuclear and hydroelectricity stations produced around 75 terawatt hours of electricity each. Renewable energy provided a negligible amount. One year later, nuclear energy overtook thermal energy as the primary source of electricity.
From 1980 to 2005, electricity production from nuclear power soared significantly to reach a peak of some 430 terawatt hours. By contrast, the figure for thermal energy saw a slight decline to only 50 terawatt hours in 1985 and remained almost unchanged for the rest of the period. The production of electricity from hydroelectric power stayed relatively stable, at around 50 terawatt hours and 80 terawatt hours, over the whole 32-year period. The amount of electricity produced from renewable energy rose slightly gradually during the last seven years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | M3hrrrrnaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | VinaKhoai | view | |
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | tungxuan | 79 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38048780488 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79199160684 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2755930414 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241864556024 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111785617392 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753014204452 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15936961868 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338130364164 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.