Write a letter to colleague who gave you a book that helped you for a presentation at work.
You should:
1.Describe the presentation
2.Why was it important
3.How did it help you
Dear John,
First of all, I would like to thanks you from the bottom from my heart for your support to land your book on "Managerial Study". I must confess that I would not have able to create such a wonderful presentation, had not read this book. My presentation lasted for 30 minutes as per the allotted time, most of the points were up to the mark and relevant to the audiences.
Topis that were included in my presentation are crisp and clear only because of the book that enhances my thoughts in constructing the ideas. Moreover, had I not referred this book, I would not have replied answer swiftly in the final Q&A session.
Furthermore, I have leant many aspects of managerial function, and I hope, it will help me in further career, when I climb up the hierarchy ladder.
By the way, I would like to return your book on this Sunday. Let me know your availability, so that I can come down to your apartment.
Best regards,
Bibhu Kalita
- Write a letter to invite your English-speaking friend to watch a new film with you about your country.In the letter, you should:•include some information about the film•explain why your friend might be interested to watch the film•inform other arran 73
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time. Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:•Say which edition and when did the article appear•Explain why you lost contact with 73
- Some people think that higher institutions should concentration more on academic subjects such as history and the physical sciences, while others think that they should concentrate more on practical subjects such as car mechanics and cookery, etc.Discuss 73
- Prevention is better than cure.”Out of a country’s health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?You should wri 73
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on children. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'thank'.
Suggestion: thank
... John, First of all, I would like to thanks you from the bottom from my heart for y...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64534883721 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76496738113 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 290.88556701 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0783653371 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 4.34317383033 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104360315886 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344543726879 0.0766984524023 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299687092287 0.0603063233224 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536430099262 0.12726935374 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03485517938 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 8.37731958763 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 8.71597938144 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.