The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The bar graph illustrates the generation and usage of electricity of top ten countries in 2014. Overall, the most of the nation generate the surplus amount of electricity than their consumption except for a few nations.
While China was the highest producer and consumer of electricity, Korea was the lowest in production and consumption of electricity among the top 10 countries. Interestingly, the combine electricity consumption and production of China and USA was more than the combine usage and production of the rest eight nations.
Although, most of the countries generate more electricity than their necessity, the Germany was the only country whose consumption of electricity was more than its production. Moreover, Russian had just manage to produce enough electricity than its requirement; it produced 1057 billion kWh of electricity against the usage of 1038 billion kWh. The nations such as Canada, France, and Brazil manufactured more or less same amount of electricity, and their consumption patterns were also remained the similar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-26 | datprono28 | 73 | view |
- You and your friend have recently purchased tickets for a theatrical performance in advance.However, you can’t make it due to some personal reasons. You have decided to apologise to your friend as you can’t make it to the theatre with him.Write a lett 89
- Bar Chart Owned and Rented Households 78
- While parking his car in the lane outside your home, a neighbour has caused some damage to your car. You have decided to write to this neighbour.Write a letter to him/her. In the letter:say why you are writingdescribe the damage caused to your carsay how 73
- Write a letter to colleague who gave you a book that helped you for a presentation at work.You should:1.Describe the presentation2.Why was it important3.How did it help you 73
- The author of the aargument claims that the replacing of Mathescam Bridge will be not be a effective measure. To support his arugument, author presents the evidence of demand of drivers, that they mainly ccomplain about uneven pavement and close lanes. So 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while, except for, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54938271605 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08540724133 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6674008775 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.833333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293419061011 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173252720943 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974912839378 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221205703523 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861130711876 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.