Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It has argued that government and bigger brands collectively should work in making the atmosphere better instead of depending on individuals from the society. Although, government and bigger companies are the main culprits in damaging environment, I am of the opinion that individuals should also support in making this change possible for the future.
Higher authorities should take burden of repairing environmental conditions by improving living conditions for the current and future generations. As big brands are becoming wealthier by selling their products in the market with the support of people, therefore they must benefit the society by starting initiatives like cleaning environment dirt to make the survival better for tomorrow. For instance, organization Nestle in India, regulates the drainage cleaning drive by involving its employee for one day in a year to encourage local people in the society on cleaning and hygiene needs.
Individual awareness is equally important in making environmental changes possible on practical scale. The money spent by the government can clean the dirt of environment but without the knowledge of such things between people will be an incomplete solution for instance, cleaning of rivers through installing filters will remove the debris but the source of contamination will remain as it is, therefore it is vital to involve people in such campaign in repairing the natural utilities like rivers and tourist destinations.
In conclusion while, the governments and organizations can spend money by raising projects in cleaning and making things better, but without the involvement of individuals it is not possible to making such changes completely. Therefore, I believe that such initiatives require support of all rather than depending on each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | Parismz | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gaurav2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Rajie | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
- Most high level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women? 56
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 61
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 73
- You have decided to resign from your work in order to try a new field.Write a letter of resignation to your boss. In your letter1- Tell your boss of your decision and explain why are you leaving?2- Explain what you have learnt from your current job and ho 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...nt of individuals it is not possible to making such changes completely. Therefore, I b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56363636364 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0020731129 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.3381993838 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.0 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209780748347 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961616341317 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557165614558 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133433014011 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680382070651 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.