Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Student attend university to deepen their knowledge in their favorable majors. However, they seek to improve their social skills. History courses can increase student's information about the history of their countries. It is a controversial idea that all university students should be required to take history courses regarding to their field of study. As far as I am concerned, I totally disagree with this idea.
To begin with, the main purpose of student from attendance to university is to improve their knowledge and information in their favorable majors. Taking courses relevant to their field of study enables them to become expert and accordingly take a decent job after graduation. For students who study in engineering or medicine majors, taking history courses cannot help them in their field. The student should take a wide variety of courses and do huge numbers of assignment, which put them under a huge pressure. Their time is so limited and taking irrelevant courses would be waste of time. For example, there were many irrelevant courses in curriculum of my university that only took my time.
Moreover, all students, at least in my country, take history courses during school. I cannot deny the importance of history in improving the social skills of student as they can learn many things about their country and their cultures. However, in my point of view, studying history in both school and university is not necessary. Students learn basic knowledge in school and after choosing their majors they took relevant courses in the university. The students who are interested in history would take that as their major in university. Taking history courses for students who are not interested in that would be hard and may decreases their average score. Moreover, students who want to know basic information about history of their country can earn those information from different books and journals.
In conclusion, I believe that taking history courses would be waste of time and energy for students who want to become expert in other majors. Moreover, it would be frustrating for student who are not interested in history and put them under pressure.
- Watching Television is bad for children agree or disagree 56
- Is the ability to read and write more important today than in the past? Why or why not? 60
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...about history of their country can earn those information from different books and journals. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15864022663 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65562265647 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42209631728 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7073161407 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.05 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318576124919 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12582167897 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682329893612 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228607596618 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690344591654 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.