Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Forests play a crucial role in our planet earth. Some groups of people hold the idea that it is more important for human to progress than protect the forests and jungales. However, the other group may takes the opposite point. From my vantage point, I firmly believe that saving the forests must be the priority of people and governments. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on this subject by discussing three essential reasons among countless ones.
The most crucial reason for holding such an idea is that the forests are the lung of earth. They produce oxigen, the most essential subctance for surivals of human being, by obsorbing co2 and sun light as well as water and combing them under an unique procedure. By jogging and cutting trees and destroying forests, we are disrubting this process. In the past we did not need to worry about the amount of co2. Because there were no source of pollution in the earth excepct some human activity. But now, regardless of all planting and growing trees in remote area by governments and proservationists and vegetarian cover in the cities and suburbs, we are producing a large amount of co2 by burning fossil fuels. Engines and cars as well as factories are the main source of co2 in the earth and not only we do not stop them but also by advancing technology we are enhancing our developments of industries.
The second reason that worth some words here is that forests are the habitats of milions different species of animals and insects. By destroying forest not only we are belemishing their home, but also we are disrupting the flora and funa chains. Each species have created for one specific reason. They are whether the predator or the prey. What happened in my country can be a appropriate example for elaborating on this subject. The northen part of my country is more greener than the south part. In this part peole spend their life by depending on agriculture and lifestocks. A few years they found out the wild pig population was in rapid decrease. It could endanger their crops and domesticated animals. As a result, they decided to hunt these lovely animals. It was impossible, because they lived in deep and bushy forests and finiding them was not an easy task. Consequently they start destroying forests, with the porpuse of finding them more convenient. They could hunt wild pigs that days, but what they did not realize was they have abolished the hole ecosystem. The consequences are now obserbable. The forest never grow again and enormous annual floods are produced unwanted damage to their buildings and cities.
In conclusion, feorsts not only can help human being to breath healther but also help animals to have a natural life in the earth.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 60
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- TOEFL T P O 47 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...as well as water and combing them under an unique procedure. By jogging and cuttin...
^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... need to worry about the amount of co2. Because there were no source of pollution in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...e disrupting the flora and funa chains. Each species have created for one specific r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rey. What happened in my country can be a appropriate example for elaborating on ...
^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greener' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greener
...ject. The northen part of my country is more greener than the south part. In this part peole...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 869, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...and finiding them was not an easy task. Consequently they start destroying forests, with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84368308351 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58183024796 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539614561028 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5742826934 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7857142857 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6785714286 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890189657551 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245148994442 0.076458572812 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273294042726 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497062761764 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151464861589 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.