Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.
Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As the human, we have sense to protect other creatures including endagered animal species. Some our efforts to protecting rare animals may affect to valuable resources, such water, forest, natural gas, etc. In this essay, I will discuss whether or not the environment will collapse.
Most of the people believe that saving rare animals is our job before it goes extinct. However, it is definitely impossible to do and can damage valuable resources. The reason that animals need help from humans to survive is because of human intervention. We could make greatly advances in technology, agriculture, and manufacturing, so we have invaded their land and have taken their resources, then damaging out ecosystems.
Moreover, despite endangered animal species can be a keystone that prevents some struggling resources from collapsing, but they might dying off so fast because of our great effect on the valuable resources. Extinction is indeed a tragedy during the time, but that species will be replaced by many new species of that kind. We cannot and should not run around trying to save every animal species that is on the very of becoming extinct, because it has been scientifically proven that these animals will evolve into new species and survive, until they become extinct and then so on and so forth.
In the end, although we cannot save every species that becomes extinct, we can save the environment that we live in, to prevent every species from dying off. The most we can do is concentrate our efforts on conservation, recycling, and coexisting with renewable clean energy. If we focus in these effort, we can help to control the environment around us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
- Planning Map 11
- The graphs below show current rates of secondary and higher education among people in various parts of the world 74
- Declining Education Standard 56
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 61
- Development Maps 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...gas, etc. In this essay, I will discuss whether or not the environment will collapse. Most of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this effort' or 'these efforts'?
Suggestion: this effort; these efforts
... renewable clean energy. If we focus in these effort, we can help to control the environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
...in these effort, we can help to control the environment around us.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72347857293 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6794161316 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195362290514 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729829246607 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475274719659 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119825212351 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435368777205 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.