Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
In today’s world, most of the people accept what is being practiced by the majority without analyzing on their own its effects. People should think whether what they are being taught is relaiable and holds water. The issue stated is that students should always question what they are taught instead accepting it passively. In my opinion, I think this has to be the mindset for all the students all over the world. I would like to reason in the following paragraphs.
First of all, questioning open gates to search for answers that may be even non-conventional. Students who constantly question would be able to get more ideas and answers to their questions which, as a learner, helps them to look beyond what is being said. For example, if a student questions his or her teacher or parents about the science heind rocket science rather than accepting passively, he would be able to get more ideas from not only one source but also many sources that would contain ideas not told. This illustrates how even non-conventional ideas could emerge by asking questions.
Secondly, students get a strong hand on their ability to analyze the pre-conceived facts that are being widely accepted even though it may contain flaws.This helps to improve the analytical thinking ability of the students. He / She may be able to differences between what is right and what is wrong even though covered with subtlety. This, as a whole would improve the personality traits and in some cases such as Periyar, a liberal in India, who tried tom abolish caste differences even though it is accepted in the majority of the society.
In addition, it would make the student more intelligent and active. He/ She may be able to discover a new rocket science theory or able to nullify the social immoralities in his life. For example, math scientist, Ramanujam, who questions more and search more for answers.
But many people would argue that what is being taught are from the experiences of the superiors and no need of questioning. But this is not true in all the cases. Only by questioning a person could able to discover new things that are not really told.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | atharva1996 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Kiran1901 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | ifxcuo | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
- It is more important to keep our old friends than it is to make new ones 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 70
- Movies and Television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 76
- doubt on portrait 3
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...cepted even though it may contain flaws.This helps to improve the analytical thinkin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, i think, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85792349727 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66679411773 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2327120914 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304816261372 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108725452725 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187979071369 0.0758088955206 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169979104003 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147136396433 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.