Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples.

In these recent decades, by growing technology all over the world, the trend of working is created that people work remotely and it has been changing people life. However, it has both pros and cons. In this essay, advantages and disadvantages of this issue will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that people feel extremely convenient in this condition and they can work in the peaceful at home. Moreover, people especially women, can work more effectively in their home and do their duties in the home. For instance, in Iran, women tend to work outdoor although they have to do house-working and take care of their children. A recent study in the Stanford University illustrate more than 72 percent of women feel more comfortable to work remotely. Hence, it has brilliant effects on people life in recent years.
On the other hand, staying at home has some irreparable effects on human being’s life. It can lead to depression and fade away their motivation because they probably would not connect to other people and it makes them depressed. In addition, working outside leads to augmenting our knowledge by connecting to hard-working person. We can see them and the technologies that are being used in their routines. So it affects our life unconsciously. For example, I try to ask many questions about the relevant technologies in my career because it can improve my level at work.
All in all, In spite of the fact that working remote has vivid effects on people’s life, it can have irrecoverable results too. Personally, I would rather to work outside and connect to people and find some friends in my work place.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80110661662 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9390093592 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181736060142 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616652945687 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472548933603 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123725822026 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270169366447 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.