In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's world?
In recent decades, in some countries, secondary schools tend to provide general education with different range of issues. In contrast, other schools believe that some special careers in limit range are more suitable for children. From my point of view, in these ages, children should get familiar in wide range of skills and chose they own interests. However, it has both pros and cons. In this essay, the aforementioned will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that it is not necessary for children to learn wide range of subjects during their life. However, they have to learn at least one skill in professional to find a job in the future. Hence, some secondary schools would rather teach some subject particularly. For instance, in Iran, in secondary schools, technical education such as planting is thought to children. In my view, it is not a brilliant idea because children have many different abilities and these abilities should be recognized in secondary schools. Therefore, it is extremely important to teach them different kinds of skills and let them to opt.
On the other hand, some schools would prefer to teach many skills. In this situation, children have a chance to find their interests and chase their dreams. A recent study in Stanford University illustrates that more than 78 percent of children who are able to find their interest in childhood are more successful than the others. These children can find a better job and they usually will be successful person in their future life. For example, some children can play an instrument such as Guitar and they can be a musician in the future. Thus, it is the best idea to get some knowledge about general education, so they are able to follow their delightful dreams.
All in all, in spite of the fact that perhaps restricted education are useful and enough for children, they should search and find their dreams, particularly in recent decades. Personally, I would rather choose the school that children can learn various issues and these schools are more appropriate for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | rednivaralat | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | minoomrd | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people thinkyounger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people tend to believe that the wild animals and birds need extra attention and people should protect them 56
- Due the advancement in computer technology the trend of working from home will bring a dramatic change to people’s lives. Is it a positive or negative development?Give your opinion and examples. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... a brilliant idea because children have many different abilities and these abilities should be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my view, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02040816327 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63356176343 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.506076106 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6315789474 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257172632873 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834553201981 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760206324721 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176672885082 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684247048694 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.