percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features
The table shows the proportion of people who uses cell phone for seven different traits over a period of four years (2006-2010).
It is clear that there were significant increased in the percentage of using cell phone for almost characteristics during the period shown, while only make calls's trait was decreased slightly. Also, make calls's feature was the most used throughout the research period.
Between 2006 and 2010, send and receive text messages's trait mobile phone were minimal fell from 73% to 79%. Likewise, take photos and play music of features cell witnessed a rose in the proportion of using mobile phone traits by 10% and 14% respectively. During the same period, the percentage of people who use play games trait rose more than twofold, from 17% in 2006 to 41% in 2010.
During the research period, almost everyone used mobile phone for make calls characteristic and fell slightly by only 1% in 2010. By contrast, there were significant rose in the percentage of mobile phone owners who used for search the Internet and record video. Regarding search the Internet feature, the proportion of using it rose nearly double, from 41% in 2008 to 73% in 2010 and the figure for record video trait was approximately fourfold, from only 9% in 2008 to 35% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9212962963 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53777614943 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6469290292 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319658011857 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165166221113 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101339225002 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199615301705 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657967855014 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.