Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
The author of the topic states an assertion that educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claims.
Educators should not wait for the student to study the idea, trends, and concepts, because it is not necessary that all the students will able to understand the topic of its own. Instead of waiting for them to study on their own, they can give a brief idea about the fact so that when he discussed the topic with the students, they won't get confused and can easily understand the fact.
An educator may ask them to go through the topic which has to discuss in the upcoming classes but should not force them to study first on their own so that it will be easier for them to explain the fact and idea behind the topic that is being taught or going to be taught. For example, if the students are new to calculus and the teacher will only teach this topic when they studied the ideas, trends, and concepts of calculus, then it will not work as calculus is very vast and very difficult to understand for new ones. But yes you can them to go through the topic so that they might have a little idea of the topic.
In a nutshell, we can say that instead of teaching any topic only after students have studied the ideas, trends, and, the concept of that topic what they can do is ask them to go through the topic once so that they can have a basic idea about what has to be taught in the class.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | bhavya_vasudeva | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- those who make the decision on the basis of their emotion and then justify them tend to be poor decision-maker. 50
- major cities 50
- the laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o provide sound reasoning for my claims. Educators should not wait for the studen...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is being taught or going to be taught. For example, if the students are new to ...
^^
Line 8, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instead of teaching any topic only after students have studied the ideas, trends,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44408945687 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16645930439 2.79657885939 77% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472843450479 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 23.0359550562 226% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 172.906204503 60.3974514979 286% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 231.833333333 118.986275619 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 52.1666666667 23.4991977007 222% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.21951772744 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350456386755 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22852637937 0.0831039109588 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.264697526357 0.0758088955206 349% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243421599272 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102854076704 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.6 14.1392134831 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.08 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.0 12.1743820225 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.36 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.8 11.2143820225 203% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.