Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
TPO-23
Since the dawn of humanity, the human makes a lot of mistakes by his nature. Nowadays, although most people believe they should ignore their errors and focus on their speed on works, I have a penchant for working slowly but flawlessly for two reasons that I will explain.
First, mistakes never got hidden from others. Someday, someone will figure out them and compel people to correct their errors. People think by doing their job rapidly, they will acquire concession in front of others, and appeal their supervisor, friends, and families by their function. But the conclusion is always more important than spending time. For example one of my friends was architecture in office. She does every works impeccable and flawless in an extended period, at the end of the year, although some of her distant coworkers teased her rhythm. She got promoted by the chief due to her correct work. And most of his close colleagues who knew his work were eager to work with her. So despite the time she spent on each task, her correctness made her successful.
Second, people flee working by doing everything fast but not complete. They consider this approach as a way of time-saving. But as it said above, they always have to make a comeback to correct their mistakes, and this will waste their time more. Working slowly to do things accurate might seem to be a waste of time, but actually, it is not. I always wanted to do a lot of stuff in a short time quickly, but at the end, I never succeed to do anything because every time I had to spend a lot of time correcting one of my mistakes. But when I started to do everything slowly but correctly, I got capable of doing more than I was planned to do.
to sum up, doing jobs with a quick pace could seem appealing at first sight, but it has problems at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- While most of the people prefer to travel to foreign countries, others are of the opinion to visit different parts of their own country 76
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not prefer enough time to help their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...doing more than I was planned to do. to sum up, doing jobs with a quick pace co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, second, so, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5749235474 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42919349266 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6793790644 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1111111111 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212311366783 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704954629104 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458088258981 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120084046097 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400436187742 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.