People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Although the development of the society is higher than the past, most people keep a habit of reading to enhance their imagination and linguistics rather than watching TV. No matter how developed TVs are, having a book to read exert more beneficial effects on individual and society.
The access to television of humans seems to take a heavy toll on the well-being of people. A survey has been conducted by professors shows that the percentage of people watching TV make the most of ones who suffer myopia. Once youngsters are submerged in watching TV, not only are those victims were more likely to experience the declination of their creativity and their lingual ability, but this also does harm to their life, work or study. What is worse, such will also lead to diseases, like overweight, autism and so on, sometimes an undesirable consequence that further detrimentally affects way more people as well as communities.
The exposure of books, on one hand is a facilitator in extending opportunities of innovation and language skills for humans. Compared with the price of a TV, owning one is simple. By reading a book, a person is being to reach far more than what the TV would able. Specimen can make endless possibilities in their imaginary world, such as vague descriptions of characters which may never be easily gained for the most in the TV. The writing of books also perfectly meets their client’s wish, with glorious scenarios, view spots. This is a significant way for them to acquire knowledge of a new language by reading foreign books. For another, reading is also an activity which people can relax from their chaotic days, they could gather valuable information and knowledge to help them to be better citizens.
In conclusion, detrimental as reading appear to be, they do benefit the general public and the whole society educationally and if reading culture is popularized, these merits could be maximized
- People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 89
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 56
- Increasing travel between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 92
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 61
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the ones') or simply say ''most ones''.
Suggestion: most of the ones; most ones
...rcentage of people watching TV make the most of ones who suffer myopia. Once youngsters are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way more people as well as communities. The exposure of books, on one hand is a ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ading appear to be, they do benefit the general public and the whole society educationally and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0248447205 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85024146234 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8669499546 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271483221464 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859323504669 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671208100685 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152643617574 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662792671905 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.