Essay topics: TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">According to the passage, there is some technique to save the frog from extinction. The lecture, however, doubts these techniques, and thinks that none of these methods are very practical.
First, the passage argues that pesticides which use for saving the farmlands from harming will threaten the frog's lives. This concept is refuted by the lecture, which claims that reducing pesticides is not economically practical or fair. If farms in neighboring frog habitats have to follow some strict rules in usage of pesticides, those farmers have severe problems in comparison to other farmers. They may lose more crops in contrast to other farmers.
Second, the passage explains that frogs are in danger by the fungus, and there are some treatments that can prevent frogs from infection. The lecture, on the contrary, disagrees with this belief, suggesting that these treatments should apply individually for each frog. Also, these treatments should apply for offsprings and all generation. Therefore, using these treatments are very complicated and expensive.
Third, the author of the passage writes that another factor in this context is that the habitats of frogs are in danger, and this matter reduces the frog population. It is very practical to save the water habitats from excessive water use. The lecture, in contrast, states that this method is not very safe for frog population. The real problem in this situation is global warming. </span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 52 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | KerryFromHere | 3 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | stupidfella | 80 | view |
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- do you agree or disagree that friends have an impact on people 66
- Essay topics: TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43347639485 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09247050039 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549356223176 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.292814266 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4285714286 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364417098997 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125136351704 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942515873008 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2168715182 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718409763157 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.