Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world; this is the effect of globalization. Which I think is positive development. Boundaries have smudged due to relaxation in trade policies. The commodities are not limited to any particular part of world. People from different countries can experience and use same product in different part of world. No one is deprived of any product, if you can afford it you can get it. Whether it be some expensive brands like ZARA, Louis Vuitton,Armani or Varshachi.
Let’s take an example of Iphone, the product of world-renowned company Apple, launches its latest version in USA, Iphone 7. Iphone 7 is hits the global market of world like India, Japan, Australia at the same time or within a period of one month. The technology is explored by all the nations of the world almost at same time. This does not make Iphone exclusive to only US market. The globalization has increased the consumer base of companies which in progressive for country's economy, as it directly creates more jobs. A family from India is moving to UK will not face any problem in getting Indian food commodities due to availability of Indian stores, which supply their staple food. Similarly a tourist or delegate traveling to Asian countries will get their own cuisines and brands.
Summing up, I will like to state that globalization has brought the world closer and one doesn’t feel problem in adapting to new places. You can get same products in foreign land which is available in your homeland.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | Sonali Guha | 56 | view |
- You work for an international company, and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter: 56
- Some people like to travel outside their country.Others would rather travel to tourist spots in their own country first,before travelling abroad. Which do you prefer to do and why? Include specific details and examples to support your choice. 56
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 67
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disaster. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in town and cities closing.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d; this is the effect of globalization. Which I think is positive development. Bounda...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Armani
...xpensive brands like ZARA, Louis Vuitton,Armani or Varshachi. Let's take an exa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...stores, which supply their staple food. Similarly a tourist or delegate traveling to Asia...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WILL_LIKE_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'would'?
Suggestion: would
...n cuisines and brands. Summing up, I will like to state that globalization has br...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94402985075 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81588386445 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5690510094 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8125 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333841238302 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102419708083 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155684300963 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21745524271 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1536904858 0.056905535591 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.