The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charaties in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
Đề thi IELTS Writing task 1 ngày 10/03/2018
The table indicates how many billions of dollar different countries namely America, European countries and others supported technology for developing countries between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that the money given to poor nations was upward during the period in question and the figure of money sent by the US was dominant over the period.
The most striking feature is that in 2006, the American government sent the largest number of money with the figure standing at 9.7 billion dollars while those of European nations and others were significantly less with 3.3 and 2.7 billion dollars, respectively.
In 2009, whereas the number of money sent by American authority rose noticeably and doubled to 18 billion dollars, that of EU countries rose far less to 3.7 billion. In contrast, a slight decline of 0.1 billion in the amount of money was recorded in other countries.
In 2010, the figure of the US, which was still the biggest, continued to grow to 22.7 billion dollars. Likewise, there was a moderate growth to 4.0 billion in the number of European nations. Meanwhile, after a slight fall, the money of other countries experienced a remarkable climb with the figure being 3.3 billion dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-24 | angela_nancy | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus ortrain between 1970 and 2030. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars luyen thi ielts 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charaties in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010Đề thi IELTS Writing task 1 ngày 10/03/2018 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption ofelectricity in 2014. 67
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars) 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...money was recorded in other countries. In 2010, the figure of the US, which was s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, still, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04390243902 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57473192727 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546341463415 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0997674677 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222571252783 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104166750524 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800598181608 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137723919998 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812898064444 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.