The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of
electricity in 2014.
The bar chart compares 10 highest-ranking
countries in terms of electricity generation and
consumption in 2014.
Overall, the amounts of electricity produced and
consumed in China and the US were far higher than
the other nations. It is also noticeable that
Germany was the only country that consumed
more electricity than it generated.
Out of the 10 nations, China ranked first with the
production and consumption of electricity being
just over 5,300 billion kWh each. The US, the
second largest electricity producer and
consumer, generated 4,099 billion kWh and
consumed 3,866 billion kWh.
Looking at the remaining countries, we can see that Russia was the only nation with electricity
generation and consumption being just over 1,000
billion kWh each, followed by Japan and India, with
the figures being slightly lower, ranging from
698.8 to 1,057 billion kWh. The figures for the other
countries show a difference in production and
consumption of electricity at around 50-150 billion
kWh, while it is interesting to note that Germany
produced 526.6 billion kWh of electricity, but it
consumed 582.5 billion kWh.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-24 | angela_nancy | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus ortrain between 1970 and 2030. 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption ofelectricity in 2014. 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charaties in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010Đề thi IELTS Writing task 1 ngày 10/03/2018 67
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars luyen thi ielts 67
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010. (Figures are in millions of dollars) 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5593220339 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86527026511 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 216.086464176 43.030603864 502% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.8 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 3.83414634146 626% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132727050709 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922368387704 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908842904581 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517068854177 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881505163158 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.