The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for university lecturee decribing the information shown below. Make comparisons where relevant.
Information about internet users shows by the graph above between 1999 and 2009 in three countries. Overall, it can be seen that, over the period as whole the levels of internet wearer rose in all three countries without deflation, it is just the grade of utilization in each countries be at variance.
In 1999, United State of America commences of application for internet stood at 20%. Following that, Canada start-up the network to around 10%. Subsequently, mexico had lowest line of 5%. However, they began had fairly similar deviation of 5%.
These countries had significantly uplifted population in 2009. Canada in the first thread there was a sharp growth in the percentage of 99%. Secondly, USA achieved the second highest occupant of this system and reached an elevated of 85%. In contrast, Mexico had increased dramatically for 45% rather than earlier years, but was lower than the other two nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-24 | fadhiahelbas | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in japan and malaysia in this year. 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxida (CO2) emmissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 89
- The charts below show UK and USA energy comsumption in 2000 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show UK and USA energy comsumption in 2000 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...ork to around 10%. Subsequently, mexico had lowest line of 5%. However, they began had fai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12666666667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68881634429 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.72 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5739601138 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182898886496 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652932419512 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112006586752 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114345798641 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959422496145 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.