In order to success one should embrace the off-beat path. Those who are successful usually develop new ideas and undertaken experiments instead of opting for the tried and tested option. In my opinion I completely support the claim that venturing into untested water results in favorable outcomes as they break free from the monotony and opens the mind to limitless possibilities.
To begin with firstly, performing the same task repetitively makes it mundane and consequently result in a mind block. Conversely, if one is placed in an environment that changes rapidly, their mind is constantly alert. Secondly, monotony restricts the mind to create an alternate solution as one is so habitual to the nature of the work that they are unable fathom a different method. For example, many youngsters leave their desk jobs, since they find it very predictable and start a business. Once out in the business world, they don't have to constantly perform the same task and have to continuously raise the bar in order to sustain themselves. Although there are some initial hiccups, many taste success.
Moreover, undertaking risks displays confidence and ability to trusts one's instinct. There is no looking back and it opens the door to various permutations and combinations. Even though success may not be guaranteed, many accomplished people have proved that using unconventional strategies rather than the regular one's inevitably gives you the desired results. For example, Mr. Ratan Tata was one of the first to enter in the hospitality industry in India even though he was advised against it as it was presumed to be a loss making sector. However, now the Taj hotel chains are world famous and synonymous with 5 star facilities. Therefore, adopting an untried route gives way to a vast ocean of possibilities.
To conclude, successful people try out new things and take risks to challenge themselves and get ways from their similar tasks.
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: - Provide a short update about your life since you saw him/her last - Explain why you will be traveling to his/her city- Say what you would like to do when you visit his/her city 73
- You have recently attended a job interview which went well, but you are still waiting for the decision. Write a letter to HR manager of the company and say– Give details of the job.– Why do you think the interview went well?– Why do you need to know 78
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter •give contact details for when you are away •give instructions about how to care for your pet •describe other household dutie 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s. Once out in the business world, they dont have to constantly perform the same tas...
^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...splays confidence and ability to trusts ones instinct. There is no looking back and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15506329114 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85552303037 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636075949367 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.939228495 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121824796465 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035690062143 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417122136594 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869578548689 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477719431233 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.