Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Due to urbanization and industrialization many public parks and playgrounds are being converted into factories or high rise apartments. Many value open spaces, however, they believe such constructions are essential to meet the ever rising housing demand as well as it boosts economies and aids in developing business. In my opinion, although modernization is imperative, it cannot be accomplished by posing a threat to the environment.

To begin with, in order to provide shelter to the constantly growing population, many forests have been wiped off, resources have been exhausted and water bodies have been reclaimed. Providing basic housing facilities has been given priority, without any consideration to the environment. Eventually, no amount of apartments will be sufficient to solve this concern as a result of inadequate land and the population will never cease to grow. To cite an example, many public parks have been sold to private builders who in turn monetize the situation by constructing skyscrapers. Consequently, causing an imbalance in the ecosystem.

Conversely, with public parks becoming more and more scarce these days, it is the duty of the government along with the general public to preserve the few remaining ones. There are a plethora of options to develop an economy without harming the environment. For instance, governments should mark certain areas as protected zones and should not pass tenders that intend to commercialize that land. Thus ensuring development is not achieved at the cost of causing grievance to the society at nature at large.

To recapitulate, it is extremely essential to keep in mind, to maintain a balance in nature while also focusing on progress. Likewise, it is absolutely indispensable for the government to enforce strict punishments and severe fines to those who instead of maintaining the park start construction on it.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e duty of the government along with the general public to preserve the few remaining ones. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, however, likewise, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40677966102 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17108815038 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.71873236 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153283632947 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433441031527 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034492435 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815922060989 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433865699712 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.