These two maps represent the layout of Grange Park in two different years, 1920 and 2019.
At a first glance, it is clear that major changes are made related to the Fountain, Rose Gardens, and Seats. However, several other changes are also found during this 79-year period.
In a detail, the Fountain which was located in the center of Park is now replaced by Rose Garden. Formerly, there were three Rose Gardens in the park, in the northwestern side, southwestern side, and northeastern side. But in 2019, the northeastern Rose Garden has been demolished, and as a consequence, a Cafe is now built in that area. Furthermore, there were five block seats in 1920 which were located separately. But in 2019, only four block seats are found, all of them surrounding the Rose Garden.
In addition, some minor changes are also made to this park. First, there was Stage for Musicians in the western side of Fountain. Today, that building does not exist anymore, and as a replacement, Amphitheater for Concerts is installed in that location. Second, in 1920 we can spot a Glasshouse, but 79 years later, it has been replaced by Water Feature. Third, Pond for Water Plants in 1920 has already been replaced by Children's Play area in 2019. And the last is the addition of new Entrance, where visitors now can enter the park through underground car park.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83620689655 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60737030452 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.482926829268 1657% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4380229111 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1428571429 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141732848018 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492807750924 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415372167824 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805076938907 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465421123244 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.